Dingpolitik: from an interview with Bruno Latour. Link: re-public: ing democracyRe-public. K.K.: You talk about the demon of the. By the German neologism Dingpolitik, we wish to designate a risky and Latour introduces the stakes of incorporating objects into politics. Bruno Latour. In Bruno Latour & Peter Weibel (eds.), Making Things Public. MIT Press. pp. Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik.B. Latour – – Krisis
|Published (Last):||18 June 2012|
|PDF File Size:||3.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.12 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
How can this be achieved?
Dingpolitik and an internet of things
The concept of Realpolitik has shifted since the days of Bismarck. Class of Alumni: Sign in to use this feature. Within that same line of dingpolitij, the digital is often taking itself for granted maybe too much, where often the step towards WHO and HOW data is manipulated is left out of the loop.
Latour claims, that all of us are politically challenged when individuals; only when issues become public in any form of assembly, politics can happen. Sign in Create an account. Van Realpolitik naar Dingpolitik. Science Logic and Mathematics. Latour – – Krisis 2: In this proof finding, lots of problems occur: This article has no associated abstract.
He seems to be saying that openness is a prerequisite to Actor-Network Theory. Views Read View source View history. History of Western Philosophy.
From realpolitik to dingpolitik
This entry has no external links. Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy. In the second, it is the re-presentation of the object in relation to those who observe it science, technology.
While often in history, this advice has been taken too literally in the shape of dingpolltik and domes, maybe it is time to look for other places of publicity, than the rather archaic town halls, churches and parliaments. Where the focus used to lie on body politics, imagining the state as something to be formed with one General Willwe should be looking into politics of pragmatism.
Latour blames this on the dichotomy in the explanation of the word representation. Return to Practice Literature. Where objects used to be looked at as a literally matters-of fact, this is false, or at least too narrow of a view on the matter.
Here he makes the argument for disagreement and cohabiting, especially with indifferences. This page was last modified on 24 Novemberat Where this has up to now never been looked into as being political, objects are.
Added to PP index Total downloads 9of 2, Recent dingoplitik 6 months 1of 2, How can I increase my downloads? Is there something like a matter-of-fact?
Because all representation involves re presentation. No categories specified lafour this paper. No keywords specified fix it. Teodolinda Barolini – – Speculum 75 1: With a whole set of point made, the question of how Dingpolitik can take shape now remains. Christopher Norris – – Philosophy and Social Criticism 17 1: What if objects themselves can gather, spread and claim issues, turning each other into matters-of-concern?
This, asserts Latour, is what the exhibition in question explores.
From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik – An Introduction to Making Things Public |
There is a need to investigate how and through what medium the matters of concern are discussed. This brings us back to shoving stuff in a room…though how this is “eloquent” is anyone’s guess.
While one might claim that the actors in this setting are the human beings organizing this assembly, Latour djngpolitik that the influence of things have an even role in creating this assembly.
Emery – – International Journal of Ethics 25 4: