John Wansbrough, SOAS University of London, History Department, Alumnus. Studies History, Semitic languages, and Comparative Semitic Linguistics. It seems that the most radical assessment was demonstrated by John Wansbrough in his exceptional works, Quranic Studies: Sources and. To launch into a discussion of John Wansbrough and his ideas is a daunting Wansbrough’s ideas deeply must be equipped with several languages in addi.

Author: Neramar Nikolkis
Country: Paraguay
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Video
Published (Last): 20 December 2006
Pages: 340
PDF File Size: 12.37 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.64 Mb
ISBN: 832-8-95744-871-8
Downloads: 99032
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vudokree

Emblems of prophethood In this chapter Wansbrough sets out his views regarding the nature of prophethood. Muhammad pbuh was born in Mecca, grew up there and began having revelations which he claimed came from God. By his fundamental criticism of the historical credibility of the classical Islamic narratives concerning Islam’s beginnings and his attempt to develop an alternative, historically more credible version of Islam’s beginnings, Wansbrough founded the so-called “revisionist” school of Islamic Studies.

However apart from what he says about the repetitions themselves, I could not see any additional support being offered for his assertions.

Translating John Wansbrough…into English

One of the most accessible comments he makes is:. Views Read Edit View history.

The extent to which the haggadists were concerned primarily to elucidate a fixed scriptural text has perhaps been exaggerated. Isolation of such monotheist imagery as is characteristic of themes like divine wandbrough and sign, covenant and exile, indicates the perpetuation in Muslim scripture of established literary types.

The USA has been inhabited continuously from until now, with many families still living in the same areas they lived in then. Their historical core is meager and cannot be detected.

For example in one of the extracts quoted above Wansbrough dismisses the presence of Jews joun the Hijaz. It is a book laced with brilliance and insight, yet marred throughout by unusual obscurity in organization and presentation. But the variant traditions are present in such quantity as to deserve some attention in a description of the process wansbrokgh which revelation became canon.


The sectarian milieu, content and composition of islamic salvation history (John WANSBROUGH)

The disagreement between Muslims and non-Muslims is not about the basic facts but about whether Muhammad pbuh received the Quran from God or whether he composed it himself. If the Quran was composed years later and in Mesopotamia, then God could not possibly have given it to Muhammad pbuh.

The doctrinal obstacles that have traditionally impeded such investigation are, on the other hand, very well-known. The comments received while jonh facility was in use have been preserved as the image below. Not only are the resources available to scholars of the Quran much more limited than those available to their biblical-scholar counterparts, but the depth of methodological experimentation in dealing with the scriptural text has been severely limited in comparison.

Wansbrough sets the scene by explaining how he sees the Quran as fitting within the wider tradition of revelation and the preceding Jewish and Christian scriptures. I would say that when we speak of the Quran in this context, and if we are going to have a meaningful discussion johh the question, three elements must come into play: To this effect William Graham writes: However leaving aside what I believe as a matter of faith, I have a number of criticisms of Wansbrough’s approach and his conclusions.

He died at Montaigu-de-QuercyFrance.

In fact, without benefit of exegesis the Quranic story of Joseph is anything but clear, a consequence in part of its elliptical presentation and in part of occasional allusion to extra-Biblical tradition, e. Wansbrough is drawing attention to a stylistic aspect of the Quran which often surprises new readers, especially if they are familiar with the straightforward narrative style of the Bible.


The sectarian milieu, content and composition of islamic salvation history (John WANSBROUGH)

Wansbrough proceeds to critique what Muslims have written about the circumstances of revelation and the life of the Prophet, in particular the biography by Ibn Ishaq. This page previously used Facebook comments. This is to be expected since Abraham, Moses and Jesus to wansbrouh but a few were prophets of God just like Muhammad.

The author assumes total familiarity with the language wansrbough biblical scholars use to analyse and discuss the text of the Bible; a reasonable assumption given the audience that Wansbrough was writing for. Wansbrough goes on to criticise other scholars who have sought to understand the Quran relying upon the traditional chronology of its revelation.

Its composition 33 II. It is quite rare for the author of a book to succeed in irritating me no matter how much I might disagree with what the author has written but Wansbrough has succeeded in doing so. Korarf — Criticism, interpretation, etc. This is one of Wansbrough’s main accomplishments as reflected in this book, which lists 17 manuscript works.

Instead he mentions the eternal Quran as if this was a freestanding concept devised only to give the Quran more authority. Yet Wansbrough’s theory is today considered to be too wanbrough in detail, especially in the total separation of the emergence of the Quran from the person of Muhammad.