This has been due, in no small degree, to the influence of Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s critically acclaimed Epistemology of the Closet. Working from classic texts of. Epistemology of the Closet has ratings and 54 reviews. Khush said: ‘ Epistemology of the closet’ is an informative and interesting book. It is i. Buy Epistemology of the Closet 2Rev Ed by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick (ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery.
|Published (Last):||17 December 2014|
|PDF File Size:||3.29 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.12 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Other editions – View all Epistemology of the Closet: Loading comments… Trouble loading? The Beast in the Closet. At times maybe she was a bit self-indulgent, there was enough traces of self-mockery to make this forgivable, even enjoyable. Views Read Edit View history.
Issues of epistemologg, of silencing and pacifying homosexual tensions give it an extra sense of relevance. In this highly acclaimed work, Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick proposed a new mode of literary and cultural critique that destabilized a Western structural binary, in this case not a gendered one e.
And that the closet was kosogsky to protect us from the harm of those whom didn’t understand us, or wouldn’t welcomes us. I see a lot of people taking issue with this book because it’s difficult to read, and so I want to dispel a misunderstanding right up front: Topics Gender A book that changed me.
Still, this was eye-opening in many ways. It can only be said that this is one among a few perfect examples of what the academic discipline of literature can accomplish. Feb 22, John Gardner rated it it was ok. Like Epistemology of the ClosetTouching Feeling also focuses on ideas of queer theory. To prove this obvious but overlooked fact, Sedgwick lists a series of things “that can epistemologyy even people of identical gender, race, zedgwick, class, and ‘sexual orientation’ — each one of which, however, if taken seriously as pure differenceretains the unaccounted-for potential to disrupt many forms of the available thinking about sexuality”.
Mar 27, Jeremiah rated it really liked it Shelves: I really enjoyed this book since it presents such an important and useful work of modern Queer theory, but also because it goes beyond kodofsky realm of such theory, and towards the idea that the concept of sexuality and its identification is episteemology ever changing issue that is greatly affected by the social and political factors present within any era.
The notion of the important- perhaps even revolutionary- of female readers of Proust was extremely interesting and one I wished had not be tacked right at the end.
Epistemology of the Closet
How would someone grow to hate themselves or to hate others for their differences, if someone aeons ago had not given voice, conceived of such a word, as defines something to be hated? In this chapter, Sedgwick evokes the figure of the woman who cannot know: The main theme is the closet as spectacle: So much rhetoric has been propped up against this kosofsoy of the “closet” that it seems that sedgwicck creates this vicious cycle of stigmatizing people who are unsure, figuring it out, or simply constrained by other forces.
Am I missing out on an experience that is supposed to shape me? Therefore, Sedgwick is, theoretically, not presenting anything new. She is wearing a pretty dress, and an alice band; a toothy grin lights up her face.
Thanks for telling us about the problem. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. I would recommend the introduction and first chapter to everyone seriously, everyonebut the rest of kowofsky book only to those working academically on sexuality in literature.
Sep 29, Anh Le rated it really liked it Shelves: But the intro and first chapter are some of my favorite cultural criticism. This is a very accurate epistemooogy, both in terms of content and regarding the form of Epistemology of the Closet. Additionally, she theorizes that “male homosexual panic became the normal condition of male heterosexual entitlement” The book’s main theme deals with the relationship between feeling, learning, and action.
Her theory is based heavily in a post-Foucault structure with a post-Stonewall, post-AIDS crisis lens through which to view the pluralities of sexuality. University of California Pr Amazon.
Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick and Judith Butler showed me the transformative power of the word queer
To ask other readers questions about Epistemology of the Closetplease sign up. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
In the introduction, Sedgwick presents axioms — “assumptions and conclusions from a long-term project of anti-homophobic analysis” — that inform her book’s project.
Through this and various other examples, Sedgwick reveals that several sexual contradictions result in modern misunderstanding.
According to Robert Tobina writer for Philosophy and Literature”Readers who still hanker for expository prose without digressions might on occasion be frustrated with this book, as will readers whose politics differ from Sedgwick’s. Since the late s, queer studies and closeet have become vital to the intellectual and political life of the United States.
Proust and A ccloset Reserche By far the most fun chapter to read and probably the kksofsky that is both clearest on sections and obfuscating on others. The words inside, which introduce in Butler’s inimitable style the idea of gender as performance, have best been summarised, I think, by the epistemoloyg meme of a photograph of Butler delivering a lecture, overlaid with the words ” Gender — yer ‘doing’ it “.
In her preface to this updated edition Sedgwick places the book both personally and historically, looking specifically at the horror of the first wave of the AIDS epidemic and its influence on the text.
But it was the introduction to Sedgwick’s Epistemology of the Closet, titled Axiomatic, that I devoured in one sitting. This book is an early exploration in how to combine literature with contemporary dialogue on sexuality. Aug 17, Tina rated it really liked it Shelves: Probably everyone should read it, or something like it to show how culture is constituted of open secrets and unacknowledged kosorsky of various types of “others”.
Hardwickwhere the majority decision cites a seemingly unbroken line of prohibition of sodomy encompassing the Bible, Roman law, Churh law, British common law, and the laws of the various colonies, later US States.
Epistemology of the Closet – Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick – Google Books
However, I am becoming increasingly enraged with the way the metaphor of “the closet” is popularly employed: This book addresses the idea that there are two views that guide sexual identity and desire: The reality that gay women and men have been subject to the heteronormative social structures, producing a disheartening amount of pain, compulsive sexuality, and rigid identity boundaries-the equally unpleasant reality that straight people whether they admit it or not are ee to the same negative consequences of these social structures–these ideas were not necessarily new when Sedgwick’s master work was published.
When I read this I was unfamiliar with Proust and James, which made some epistsmology Sedgwick’s close reading difficult to understand, but the general points — about male homosociality and homoerotic desire being interlinked and interdependent — are well-made and substantiated to the satisfaction of all levels of reader.
And bad liars at that clsoet all the smug straight people are laughing up their sleeves at the “poor” “pathetic” “closeted” “obviously” gay person.